Risk Sharing in Occupational Pension Programmes Hybrid Plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2017.10.2Keywords:
Risk, Income division, Pensions, Pension assets, Pension schemes, Hybrid instruments, Retirement benefits, Retirement programs, Occupational Pension SchemesAbstract
The main types of retirement plans, in terms of determining the amount of the expected benefit are defined as benefit plans (DB) and defined contribution (DC) schemes. Their design causes the polarization of risk distribution associated with pension provision. Most of the risks in DB plans are borne by the organizer, while in DC plans by the participant. Hybrid plans offer the possibility of risk-sharing between the stakeholders of a pension plan. Hybrid solutions are gaining in popularity, especially in the context of occupational pension schemes. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the different types of hybrid pension plans in the light of the distribution of the risk associated with providing the expected level of pension.Downloads
References
Blake, 2015, We Need a National Narrative: Building a Consensus around Retirement Income, Independent Review of Retirement Income Report.
Blommestein, H., Janssen, P., Kortleve, N., Yermo, J., 2009, Moving Beyond the DB vs DC Debate: the Appeal of Hybrid Pension Plans, Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, vol. 2, iss. 2.
Góra, M., 2003, System emerytalny, PWE, Warszawa.
Hill, T., Pang, G., Warshawsky, M., 2010, Hybrid Pension Plans: A Comprehensive Look at Their History, Economics and Features, Towers Watson.
Komisja Europejska, 2012, Biała Księga, Agenda na rzecz adekwatnych, bezpiecznych I stabilnych emerytur, COM(2012) 55 final.
Mackenzie, S., Hybrids and Other Alternatives to the Traditional Pension, AARP Public Policy Institute Research Report.
OECD, 2015, Pensions at a Glance 2015, OECD and G20 Indicators, Paris.
Pugh, C., Yermo, J., 2008, Funding Regulations and Risk Sharing, OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, no. 17, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/241841441002.
Sutcliffe, C., 2010, Back to the Future: a Long Term Solution to the Occupational Pension Crisis, The Pensions Institute Discussion Paper, PI - 1011.
Szczepański, M., 2010, Stymulatory i bariery rozwoju zakładowych systemów emerytalnych na przykładzie Polski, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań.
Szumlicz, T., 2006, System zabezpieczenia emerytalnego, w: Kurzynowski, A. (red.), Polityka społeczna, Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, Warszawa.
Turner, J., 2014, Hybrid Pensions: Risk Sharing Arrangements for Pension Plan Sponsors and Participants, The Society of Actuaries Research Project.
Żukowski, M., 1997, Wielostopniowe systemy zabezpieczenia emerytalnego w Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Poznaniu, Poznań.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Wydawnictwo UEP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet quam leo, cursus vitae, commodo convallis consequat. Donec pulvinar porta neque, blandit risus commodo sit amet ante. Quisque condimentum. Donec orci interdum euismod scelerisque tincidunt. Maecenas vitae mi. Pellentesque orci vitae nunc venenatis tristique, convallis accumsan, dolor sit amet metus. Curabitur tempor. Phasellus sem. Quisque.
