Articles
Vol. 4 (2022): EWK
nowy tytuł
-
Submitted
-
May 17, 2021
-
Published
-
2004-12-31
Abstract
It is a review of Michael J. Behe’s book titled Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (The Free Press, New York 1996), containing the criticism of evolutionary theory. Author tries to discredit intelligent design theory, of which Behe is a proponent, on methodological grounds. According to the author, it is unscientific theory because it cannot be falsified. Moreover, in his opinion, it is an manifestation of „crank science” – it can be treated in the same way as homeopathy or polywater theory.
References
- Johnson Phillip, Darwin on Trial, Regnery Gateway, Washington, DC 1991.
View in Google Scholar
- Johnson Phillip E., Sąd nad Darwinem, przełożył Robert Piotrowski, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Vocatio”, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar
- Gish Duane T., Evolution: The Fossils Say No!, 3rd ed., Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego 1979.
View in Google Scholar
- Coyne J.A., „God in the Details”, Nature 1996, vol. 383, s. 227-228.
View in Google Scholar
- Orr H. Allen and Coyne Jerry A., „The Genetics of Adaptation: A Reassessment”, The American Naturalist 1992, vol. 140, s. 725-742.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
-
Kenneth R. Miller,
Life's Grand Design
,
DEMO: Vol. 1 (2004)
-
Kazimierz Jodkowski,
Wielki projekt życia
,
DEMO: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021)
-
Kenneth R. Miller,
Ponownie darwinizm kontra inteligentny projekt
,
DEMO: Vol. 3 No. 23 (2022): RM
-
Robert Magdziak,
Russell F. Doolittle,
Sublime balance
,
DEMO: Vol. 3 No. 23 (2022): RM
-
Inga Kuźma,
Kazimierz Fortuna (1943–2016)
,
DEMO: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
-
Julio David Castellanos,
Babu George,
Boardroom leadership: The board of directors as a source of strategic leadership
,
DEMO: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020)
-
Moshe Manor,
Joanna Ratajczak,
Shift to private pension system: The case of Poland and Israel
,
DEMO: Online first
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.